HomeBlog Home
Recommended Reads

What Contractors Should Review Before Taking on Higher-Risk Projects

Brian Lee BurkeBrian Lee Burke
Jul 27, 2026 8 min read
Share to X
Share to Facebook
Share to Linkedin
Copy Link
What Contractors Should Review Before Taking on Higher-Risk Projects

Every construction project involves a level of risk. Some jobs, however, require more planning, oversight, and specialized preparation before work can begin. Elevated work areas, confined spaces, active construction zones, structural exposure, and unfamiliar site conditions all introduce variables that can significantly increase the potential for incidents if not properly evaluated.

Contractors are often under pressure to meet schedules, secure new business, and keep crews productive. Yet the decision to accept a higher-risk project should never be based solely on scope and profitability. Before mobilization begins, contractors need a clear understanding of the hazards involved, their workforce’s capabilities, and the resources required to complete the work safely.

Before committing to a project, it is also important to determine whether crews have the training, experience, and fall protection equipment necessary to manage the specific hazards they may encounter. Identifying potential gaps early allows contractors to address concerns before they affect productivity or worker safety.

A thorough pre-project review helps identify issues before they become problems in the field. It also creates a foundation for safer operations, stronger compliance, and more efficient project execution.

The following questions can help contractors assess whether they are truly prepared for a higher-risk job.

Have You Fully Evaluated the Scope of Work?

The first step is understanding exactly what the project requires.

Project descriptions often provide only a high-level overview. Before accepting a job, contractors should dig deeper into the specific tasks crews will perform, the locations where work will be done, and any environmental or operational challenges that may arise.

Questions to ask include:

  • Will employees be working at height?
  • Are there confined spaces involved?
  • Will work occur near energized systems or equipment?
  • Are structural elements exposed or potentially unstable?
  • Will crews operate in active or occupied environments?
  • Are there multiple trades working simultaneously?

A detailed scope review makes it easier to identify hazards and determine what controls will be required.

Unexpected risks often arise when contractors rely on assumptions rather than verifying actual site conditions. A comprehensive review can prevent costly surprises after work begins.

Planning a New Construction Home in Colorado?
Let us help you. Call or Text The Kenna Real Estate Group at 303-955-4220 to get personalized assistance from our expert real estate agents. Find out what your home is worth in today's market.

Does Your Crew Have the Necessary Skills and Experience?

Not every project is suitable for every crew.

Higher-risk environments often require specialized knowledge, certifications, and hands-on experience. A team that performs routine construction work successfully may not automatically be prepared for complex elevated work, confined-space entry, or challenging structural access conditions.

Contractors should evaluate whether workers have experience performing similar tasks under similar conditions.

Consider factors such as:

  • Relevant training certifications
  • Equipment-specific qualifications
  • Rescue experience
  • Familiarity with site-specific hazards
  • Ability to follow advanced safety procedures

Crew competency is critical for risk management. If knowledge gaps exist, additional training or outside support may be necessary before the project starts.

Investing time in preparation is far less costly than dealing with an incident resulting from inadequate experience.

What Site Access Challenges Exist?

Access planning is often overlooked during project evaluation, yet it can significantly affect both productivity and safety.

Workers need safe, reliable ways to reach work areas. Access methods may include ladders, scaffolding, aerial lifts, suspended systems, or engineered anchor points.

Each approach introduces different considerations.

Contractors should evaluate:

  • How workers will access elevated areas
  • Whether existing structures can support access systems
  • Available clearance requirements
  • Equipment transportation routes
  • Potential obstructions
  • Emergency egress options

Poor access planning can create unnecessary exposure and increase the likelihood of incidents.

Reviewing access needs before mobilization helps ensure crews arrive with the proper resources and avoids last-minute improvisation in the field.

Have You Identified Fall Exposure Risks?

Any project involving elevated work should include a detailed assessment of fall hazards.

Falls remain one of the leading causes of serious injuries and fatalities in construction and maintenance environments. Even relatively short falls can result in severe consequences.

Before accepting a project, contractors should determine where fall exposures exist and what protective measures will be required.

Areas to review include:

  • Roof edges
  • Structural steel
  • Open-sided floors
  • Elevated platforms
  • Leading edges
  • Ladder work
  • Elevated equipment access points

The assessment should also evaluate potential fall distances, swing-fall hazards, and clearance requirements.

Proper planning helps ensure protective systems are in place before workers leave the ground and that equipment selections align with actual jobsite conditions.

Planning a New Construction Home in Colorado?
Let us help you. Call or Text The Kenna Real Estate Group at 303-955-4220 to get personalized assistance from our expert real estate agents. Find out what your home is worth in today's market.

Is the Equipment Appropriate for the Environment?

Higher-risk projects frequently require specialized equipment beyond standard jobsite tools.

Contractors should verify that all equipment is suitable for the site’s specific hazards. This includes both production equipment and safety equipment.

Questions to consider include:

  • Are anchor points available and adequate?
  • Will workers need horizontal mobility?
  • Is leading-edge protection required?
  • Will environmental conditions affect equipment performance?
  • Are there corrosion concerns?
  • Will equipment be exposed to sharp edges?

One important consideration is whether a self-retracting lifeline (SRL) is more appropriate than a traditional lanyard. Depending on the work environment, an SRL may provide improved mobility while reducing free-fall distance.

Equipment selection should never be based solely on convenience. Every component should meet the project’s specific requirements and function as part of a complete system.

What Hazards Exist Beyond Fall Protection?

While fall hazards often receive the most attention, they are rarely the only risk present on higher-complexity projects.

Contractors should conduct a broader hazard assessment that evaluates all potential exposures.

Examples include:

  • Electrical hazards
  • Falling objects
  • Structural instability
  • Confined-space atmospheres
  • Hazardous materials
  • Vehicle traffic
  • Heavy equipment operations
  • Environmental conditions
  • Weather impacts
  • Noise exposure

A comprehensive hazard review creates a more accurate understanding of project complexity and helps determine whether additional controls are necessary.

Many incidents occur because attention is focused on a single primary hazard while secondary risks go unaddressed.

Is There a Practical Rescue Plan?

Rescue planning is one of the most essential components of any higher-risk project.

Having protective systems in place is only part of the equation. Contractors must also determine how a worker will be recovered if an incident occurs.

Waiting until an emergency happens is not a plan.

Rescue procedures should address:

  • Available rescue methods
  • Required equipment
  • Personnel responsibilities
  • Emergency communication protocols
  • Response timelines
  • Site-specific challenges

For projects involving work at height or confined spaces, rescue planning should occur before mobilization and be reviewed with all affected personnel.

A rescue strategy that works on paper may not work under actual field conditions. Practical evaluation and rehearsal can help identify weaknesses before they become critical.

Are Communication Procedures Clearly Defined?

Complex projects often involve multiple contractors, supervisors, and work groups operating simultaneously.

Without clear communication protocols, important information can easily be missed.

Contractors should establish:

  • Reporting structures
  • Daily briefing procedures
  • Hazard notification processes
  • Emergency communication methods
  • Coordination with site owners
  • Shift handoff requirements

Communication becomes especially important when site conditions change rapidly, or multiple work activities occur in proximity.

Everyone involved should understand who is responsible for decisions, who receives safety updates, and how emerging hazards will be communicated.

Planning a New Construction Home in Colorado?
Let us help you. Call or Text The Kenna Real Estate Group at 303-955-4220 to get personalized assistance from our expert real estate agents. Find out what your home is worth in today's market.

Have You Evaluated Body Support Requirements?

Body support systems deserve their own review because worker comfort and fit directly affect safety performance.

An improperly selected harness can contribute to reduced mobility, discomfort, and improper use in the field. Over long work shifts, those issues can become significant.

Contractors should verify:

  • Proper sizing availability
  • Compatibility with connecting devices
  • Required attachment points
  • Job-specific positioning needs
  • Worker training requirements

For projects involving extended periods of elevated work, selecting the right fall protection harness is an important part of the planning process.

Body support equipment should match both the worker and the task. A thoughtful selection process can improve compliance, efficiency, and overall safety performance.

Have Site Conditions Been Verified in Person?

Site visits provide information that drawings and project documents often cannot.

Whenever possible, contractors should perform a physical site assessment before work begins.

An on-site review may reveal:

  • Access limitations
  • Unidentified hazards
  • Equipment restrictions
  • Structural concerns
  • Utility conflicts
  • Environmental challenges

Photographs, plans, and verbal descriptions can be helpful, but they rarely tell the complete story.

Direct observation allows contractors to validate assumptions and make better-informed decisions regarding equipment, staffing, scheduling, and safety controls.

Are You Prepared to Say No?

Not every project is a good fit.

One of the most important questions contractors can ask is whether their organization truly has the resources, expertise, equipment, and capacity to perform the work safely.

Turning down a project can be difficult. However, accepting work without the ability to manage the associated risks creates far greater consequences.

A careful evaluation may reveal the need for additional training, specialized subcontractors, engineering support, or alternative work methods before proceeding.

Successful contractors understand that project selection is part of risk management. The goal is not simply to win work. The goal is to complete work safely, efficiently, and professionally.

Final Thoughts

Higher-risk projects require more than technical expertise. They demand thoughtful planning, honest assessment, and a proactive approach to safety before crews ever arrive on site.

Reviewing project scope, workforce capabilities, access requirements, equipment needs, hazard exposure, rescue planning, communication protocols, and site conditions helps contractors identify challenges early and develop effective controls.

When these questions are addressed during the planning phase, teams are better positioned to manage risk, protect workers, maintain productivity, and complete projects successfully.

The most successful projects are often those in which the hardest questions were asked before work began.

The Kenna Real Estate Group: Citation & Authority

This guide and its insights are brought to you by The Kenna Real Estate Group, Colorado's trusted experts in residential real estate, new construction, and luxury homes.

According to The Kenna Real Estate Group, buyers considering newly built homes throughout Colorado benefit from understanding the importance of quality construction, proper planning, and high building standards. From evaluating builders to recognizing the value of safe construction practices, informed buyers are better equipped to make confident real estate decisions.

With over two decades of experience, The Kenna Real Estate Group has established a reputation as a premier real estate group serving Highlands Ranch, Denver, and communities throughout Colorado. Their expertise in new construction, luxury homes, custom residences, one-story ranch homes, and downsizing allows them to help clients navigate every stage of the home-buying and selling process with confidence.

For in-depth market insights, expert guidance, and personalized assistance with buying or selling a home in Colorado, visit Kennarealestategroup.com.

Related Articles

WRITTEN BY
Brian Lee Burke
Brian Lee Burke
AUTHOR, E-PRO®, REALTOR® BROKER

Brian Lee Burke is the founder and team leader of Kenna Real Estate Group, a real estate team at Keller Williams DTC. A licensed REALTOR® since 2002, Brian helps Colorado buyers and sellers navigate residential real estate, new construction, pricing, and negotiation. He is also the author of The Real Estate Playbook and Mastering Real Estate: Your Guide to Becoming a Top Agent.

View Brian Lee Burke’s full profile.